DOI
https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v2i2.127Abstract
Blood lactate levels are a simple and inexpensive parameter that is increasingly available to practitioners in both emergency medicine and general practice. But what does it really tell us? The earliest studies in people dating from the 1970s were the first to advocate lactate as a prognostic indicator with one of the landmark studies showing that as admission lactate concentration increased from 2.1 to 8.0 mmol/L survival decreased from 90% to 10%. When treating emergency patients with distressed owners, there is something very attractive about the idea of measuring a simple parameter on admission that could give us a better sense of prognosis than our clinical opinion alone... But does the data support that? In this session we will briefly review lactate physiology and then focus on the small animal veterinary evidence base – how has it evolved, what do we now know and where are the gaps in knowledge and potential misinterpretations that could affect our use of this clinical tool.
References
NA
License
Veterinary Evidence uses the Creative Commons copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially - with the appropriate citation.
Similar Articles
- Ellie Sellers, Sarah Baillie, Rachel Dean , Sheena Warman, Heidi Janicke, Sebastian P Arlt, Clare Boulton, Marnie Brennan, David Brodbelt, Fiona Brown, Louise Buckley, Myai Du, Emma Gallop, George Goran, Douglas JC Grindlay, Laura Haddock, Joanne Ireland, Catherine McGowan, Heather K Moberly, Emma Place, Md Mizanur Rahman, Gwen Rees, Kristen Reyher, Javier Sanchez, Johan P Schoeman, Laura Urdes, John VanLeeuwen, Kristien Verheyen, Promoting Evidence-based Veterinary Medicine through the online resource ‘EBVM Learning’: User feedback , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): The first issue of 2021
- Nieky van Veggel, A Guide for Students and Staff (Thinking of) Doing Systematic Reviews , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): The first issue of 2018
- Emma Place, Literature Searching for Evidence-Based Veterinary Medicine: Coping with Zero Hits , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 1 No. 4 (2016): Our fourth issue
- Richard Mellanby, The Only Way Is Ethics? Undertaking Research as a Practice-Based Vet/RVN , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): The first issue of 2017
- Louise O'Dwyer, Challenges of EBVM as a RVN in a Practice Setting , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): The first issue of 2017
- Heather Moberly, Integrating Veterinary Subject Expertise With Information Literacy Expertise to Teach and Assess the Student Skills in Evidence-based Veterinary Medicine , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): The second issue of 2017
- Richard Evans, Letter from the Editor , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2016): The inaugural issue
- Ian Nicholson, Building a Multi-centre Clinical Research Facilitation Network: The ARC Experience , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): The second issue of 2017
- Rachel Dean, Irrelevant, Irrelevant, Irrelevant! Time to change our approach to research? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 1 No. 4 (2016): Our fourth issue
- Gillian Leng, Using Evidence: Pitfalls, Practicalities and Positive Benefits , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 1 No. 4 (2016): Our fourth issue
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Emma Donnelly, Amanda Boag, Daniel H Lewis, Ide Hearun, Laura Playforth, Survival and Presenting Complaint of Canine and Feline Paediatric Emergencies Presenting to UK Emergency Clinics , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 3 No. 3 (2018): The third issue of 2018
