DOI
https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v6i4.400Abstract
PICO question
Can the use of a synthetic feline interdigital semiochemical (FIS), with the provision of a scratching post, redirect unwanted scratching behaviour in cats better than provision of a scratching post alone?
Clinical bottom line
Category of research question
Treatment
The number and type of study designs reviewed
Three studies were evaluated. One was a randomised blinded trial on a single group of subjects following a crossover repetition design (Cozzi et al., 2013), the second was an open, uncontrolled study (Beck et al., 2018), and the third was a randomised unblinded trial on a single group of subjects using a placebo (Zhang et al., 2019).
Strength of evidence
Weak
Outcomes reported
In two of the three studies where the FIS pheromone was applied to the scratching posts resulted in a statistically significant increase in the cats’ scratching behaviour compared to the control. The third study showed a result approaching statistical significance (p = 0.06).
Conclusion
Based on the assessed studies there is weak evidence that FIS used in conjunction with the provision of a scratching post is more successful in redirecting unwanted scratching behaviour than provision of a scratching post alone. However, further studies using larger and more representative cohorts are needed in order to confirm the accuracy of these results.
How to apply this evidence in practice
The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.
Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.
References
Amat, M., Camps, T. & Manteca, X. (2016). Stress in owned cats: behavioural changes and welfare implications. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 18(8), 577– DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X15590867
Atkinson, T. (2018). Practical feline behaviour: understanding cat behaviour and improving welfare. 1st. ed. Wallingford: CABI. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781780647838.0000
Beck, A., De Jaeger, X., Collin, J.-F. & Tynes, V. (2018). Effect of a synthetic feline pheromone for managing unwanted scratching. The International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine. 16(1).
Cozzi, A., Lafont Lecuelle, C., Monneret, P., Articlaux, F., Bougrat, L., Mengoli, M. & Pageat, P. (2013). Induction of scratching behaviour in cats: efficacy of synthetic feline interdigital semiochemical. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 15(10), 872– DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X13479114
Golden, O. & Hanlon, A.J. (2018). Towards the development of day one competences in veterinary behaviour medicine: survey of veterinary professionals experience in companion animals practice in Ireland. Irish Veterinary Journal. 71(12). DOI: https://doi.org/1186/s13620-018-0123-3
Horwitz, D. (2019). Common feline problem behaviours: Urine spraying. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 21(3), 209–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1098612X19831203
PAW PDSA Animal Wellbeing Report [PDSA] [online]. (2018). Available at: https://www.pdsa.org.uk/media/4371/paw-2018-full-web-ready.pdf [Accessed 28 July 2020].
Stelow, E. (2018). Diagnosing Behaviour Problems: A Guide for Practitioners. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. 48(3), 339–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2017.12.003
Wassink-van der Schot, A.A., Day, C., Morton, J.M., Rand, J. & Phillips, C.J.C. (2016). Risk factors for behavior problems in cats presented to an Australian companion animal behavior clinic. Journal of Veterinary Behaviour. 14, 34–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2016.06.010
Zhang, L. & McGlone, J.J. (2020). Scratcher preferences of adult in-home cats and effects of olfactory supplements on cat scratching. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 227.
License
Veterinary Evidence uses the Creative Commons copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially - with the appropriate citation.
