DOI
https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v2i2.110Abstract
Including current published evidence is vital as part of evidence-based decision making in veterinary practice. Sometimes there is no published evidence which is relevant or applicable to the clinical situation.
This can be either because it refers to patients with experimentally induced conditions, from a referral population or who lack the co-morbities often seen outside of the experimental context. The Veterinary Clinical Trials Network is unique. It is a rapidly expanding network of veterinary practices, with whom we are working to establish methods for running prospective, pragmatic, practical clinical trials in veterinary practice.
Data is extracted from the patient record using an XML Schema. The data extracted is already captured by the Practice Management Software (PMS) system as part of the consultation, no extra information is required, and the extraction method is automated. This improves participation as it minimises the time input required from vets and vet nurses. Other data is obtained directly from owners of the animals involved.
By working with a large number of first opinion veterinary practices we are able to include enough patients to ensure that our trials are suitably powered, and the participants will be representative of the wider vet-visiting pet population. The research generated from this clinical trials network will help strengthen the evidence base to aid decision making by veterinary practitioners.
References
NA
License
Veterinary Evidence uses the Creative Commons copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially - with the appropriate citation.
Similar Articles
- Ellie Sellers, Sarah Baillie, Rachel Dean , Sheena Warman, Heidi Janicke, Sebastian P Arlt, Clare Boulton, Marnie Brennan, David Brodbelt, Fiona Brown, Louise Buckley, Myai Du, Emma Gallop, George Goran, Douglas JC Grindlay, Laura Haddock, Joanne Ireland, Catherine McGowan, Heather K Moberly, Emma Place, Md Mizanur Rahman, Gwen Rees, Kristen Reyher, Javier Sanchez, Johan P Schoeman, Laura Urdes, John VanLeeuwen, Kristien Verheyen, Promoting Evidence-based Veterinary Medicine through the online resource ‘EBVM Learning’: User feedback , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): The first issue of 2021
- Nieky van Veggel, A Guide for Students and Staff (Thinking of) Doing Systematic Reviews , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): The first issue of 2018
- Emma Place, Literature Searching for Evidence-Based Veterinary Medicine: Coping with Zero Hits , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 1 No. 4 (2016): Our fourth issue
- Richard Mellanby, The Only Way Is Ethics? Undertaking Research as a Practice-Based Vet/RVN , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): The first issue of 2017
- Louise O'Dwyer, Challenges of EBVM as a RVN in a Practice Setting , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): The first issue of 2017
- Heather Moberly, Integrating Veterinary Subject Expertise With Information Literacy Expertise to Teach and Assess the Student Skills in Evidence-based Veterinary Medicine , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): The second issue of 2017
- Richard Evans, Letter from the Editor , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2016): The inaugural issue
- Ian Nicholson, Building a Multi-centre Clinical Research Facilitation Network: The ARC Experience , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): The second issue of 2017
- Rachel Dean, Irrelevant, Irrelevant, Irrelevant! Time to change our approach to research? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 1 No. 4 (2016): Our fourth issue
- Gillian Leng, Using Evidence: Pitfalls, Practicalities and Positive Benefits , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 1 No. 4 (2016): Our fourth issue
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
