DOI
https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v2i2.110Abstract
Including current published evidence is vital as part of evidence-based decision making in veterinary practice. Sometimes there is no published evidence which is relevant or applicable to the clinical situation.
This can be either because it refers to patients with experimentally induced conditions, from a referral population or who lack the co-morbities often seen outside of the experimental context. The Veterinary Clinical Trials Network is unique. It is a rapidly expanding network of veterinary practices, with whom we are working to establish methods for running prospective, pragmatic, practical clinical trials in veterinary practice.
Data is extracted from the patient record using an XML Schema. The data extracted is already captured by the Practice Management Software (PMS) system as part of the consultation, no extra information is required, and the extraction method is automated. This improves participation as it minimises the time input required from vets and vet nurses. Other data is obtained directly from owners of the animals involved.
By working with a large number of first opinion veterinary practices we are able to include enough patients to ensure that our trials are suitably powered, and the participants will be representative of the wider vet-visiting pet population. The research generated from this clinical trials network will help strengthen the evidence base to aid decision making by veterinary practitioners.
References
NA
License
Veterinary Evidence uses the Creative Commons copyright Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially - with the appropriate citation.
Similar Articles
- Mike Clarke, Evidence Aid: Using Systematic Reviews to Improve Access to Evidence for Humanitarian Emergencies , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 2 No. 4 (2017): The fourth issue of 2017
- Marios Charalambous, Antiepileptic Drugs’ Tolerability and Safety – a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Adverse Effects in Dogs , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 1 No. 4 (2016): Our fourth issue
- Peter Cockcroft, Quality improvement and audits in clinical practice , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020): The first issue of 2020
- Tafara Mapuvire, Is TTA better than lateral suture in small dogs with cruciate disease? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): The second issue of 2020
- Peter Cockcroft, The missing link between practice and research , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): The second issue of 2020
- Clare Boulton, Finding the Evidence , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2016): The inaugural issue
- Thomas Smith-Uchotski, In cats which treatment, meloxicam or prednisolone, most quickly reduces clinical signs of feline interstitial cystitis? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): The first issue of 2022
- Marc Andrew Charles Silpa, There is No Evidence For or Against the Use of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs to Reduce the Clinical Duration of Kennel Cough (Infectious Tracheobronchitis). , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2016): The inaugural issue
- Louise Anne Buckley, Are Pressure Vests Beneficial at Reducing Stress in Anxious and Fearful Dogs? , Veterinary Evidence: Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): The first issue of 2018
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.